← Work

Oversight for a routing AI

Led research and interface design for ARTC’s Hunter Valley network control, moving train controllers from manual routing to supervising GE’s routing AI.

Mudbath · ARTC / GE · 2017

2017
AI planning trains, with people kept in charge
4 hrs
demanding shifts the interface was designed around
Manual → AI
controllers moved from routing to supervising
01  The problem
Senior UX / CX Designer, Mudbath Digital · Oct 2015 – Aug 2020

Every train in the Hunter region was planned by hand, on paper. It took an enormous amount of time and skill from train operators, on top of managing maintenance requests and emergencies.

ARTC’s Hunter Valley network control program (ANCO) brought in GE’s routing AI to plan train movements. The plan could come from the machine, but controllers still carried responsibility for the network. They needed to see what the AI was doing, and to step in when something didn’t fit.

02  What I did

I led the operator research and interface design. That meant understanding how controllers actually work through demanding four-hour shifts, and designing for that reality rather than for a demo.

The interface gave controllers oversight of the AI’s routing, and a way to steer the exceptions it couldn’t judge on its own, such as priority trains and dock loading. It ran on the web, so operators could plan from any device, at any time.

We validated it with usability testing at every stage: wireframes, prototypes and visual design.

—  In pictures
2 images
ARTC network control board for Upper Hunter 2, with block working, conditions affecting the network and live notifications
The network board: block working, conditions affecting the network, and live notifications like derailments, track damage and flooding.
ARTC mobile train information view with trains, arrival and departure times and coal terminals
Train info on any device: each train’s arrivals, departures, loads and crew changes.
03  The result

Controllers moved from routing trains by hand to supervising the AI, and the work was delivered with positive operator feedback.

04  What it taught me

“It was the question I still work on: when should a person hand over to the machine, and how do they take back control when they shouldn’t?”

→  Next case study
Earned Autonomy→